Import 1000+ names as "site members" to new page

HelloYisrael,
thanks for reply.
I just have spend 1-hour trying to understand where the import goes to?
a) PrivateMembersArea
b) Custom Member-Database.

Since Ahmad confirmed my statements and observations, that it is NOT possible to import data into “PrivateMembersData” directly, so it should be a “custom-member-data”, where the data is imported to. Do i understand it right? If not then i am very confused :grin::sweat_smile:.
Yes, by using his own custom login-system i see no problems except the “PW-SECURITY”.

So my main question right now would be…

  1. Where does the import goes to? (custom database or “PrivateMembersData”).
  2. If it is the “PrivateMembersData”, how the import is possible?
  3. If the import realy is possible, how?
  4. The list of users in this case, are passwords included in this list? Or even the question, are passwords in this case needed?

Why i am asking if password is needed in this case…

I could actually see some sort of procedure whereby a site owner/admin imports a list of users with at least an email field.
Just an eMail needed?

  1. The import would automatically trigger a verification email to be sent to the user, who would then have to click a link/button/something to verify their email, and would then be prompted to enter a password.
    Ok, a registration needs always at least an e-Mail + password ok.
    But how the import can be done without entering a pw?
    The only way could be to enter a temporary pw, or is this conclusion/statement wrong?

And the last question.
Why i can register a new member in using Wix-LogIn, without getting any confirm-Emails? This registered users can also use Wix-related stuf, right?

Damn, now i am really confused xDDDDDDDD

P.S: And then Ahmad mentioned some kind of HTML-solution, what? :scream_cat::upside_down_face:

Could you please clarify, at least a little bit, or describe a little bit more detailed a theoretical process?

Why i am asking is, i want to understand this stuff.
Strange that i have more interest on any solution to this issue then the “post-owner” :grin: