Hi @Rob ! Thanks for your quick reply. I think the test site feature is just for checking some mild & quick changes in the site. Would you agree?
If I wanted to build a brand new section to be added on my site, I would be propably better off duplicating my original site and making amendments to the duplicate one and later making the duplicate one the main site. Do you agree or how would you rather do this? I am looking to have a UAT version of my site, since I am planning to make it remarkably bigger in the future.
Of course during the making of the new section, I don’t want any of my clients to see it. The process could easily take a month and if I was using the test site feature, I could not make any changes to the live site without publishing the already made changes regarding the new section.
I believe dynamic content could be part of the solution, but not really the same thing as having a UAT version. I am also afraid of losing changes to the database e.g. contacts made during the month’s build time on the live site, if I go with the duplicate plan. Can you recommend me the best way forward? Is it possible to merge sites?